These are banners of our friends, site members, and affiliates.
 Host Bios   On-Demand Show Archives   Forums   Photos   Contact   PR / Affiliates   Appearances   Field Reporters   Downloads  Links 
  
 

Do humans unconsciously project psychic energy beyond time and space?

 
By Max Szabo at February 28, 2006 - 5:22am | Paranormal Experiences

If we do, and if the output of these energies is considerable, one could imagine that our planet may be a beacon of (perhaps very chaotic) psychic energies and communications that may be noticeable to psychically-sensitive entities which (who?) are not fixed in our own timespace context.

If so, could the unstructured, wilful ignorance of post-Enlightened humans (i.e. first-world Westerners) regarding their collective psychic power be a magnet for inquisitive and/or exploitative entities?

If so, could our many, cross-cultural myths of energy-draining supernatural creatures suggest that this interdimensional attraction is long-established?

If so, could such theoretical entities be concerned at the prospect of a widespread increase in controlled human psychic education?

If so, could ghostly phenomenon (apparitions, hauntings, etc.) be attributable to the uptake of human-centric psychic energies, motifs and stories by such entities via some feedback mechanism, whether intended or not?

If so, could the ‘snowballing’ effect of ghost stories increase the energy-investment of interested human parties in those situations, leading to an increase in ghost-related phenomena?

To what degree, then, is the active human ghost investigator the catalyst for recorded phenomena?

Further, what is the average psychic capability of the average ghost investigator, and how does that relate to the type and quantity of evidence that they produce?

And what of the group-will experiments used by paranormal investigators to 'produce' results?

Is someone, somewhere and/or somewhen feeling obliging, and reciprocating?

If so, why?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Do humans unconsciously

By GarageSorcerer on March 1, 2006 - 4:27pm

Do humans unconsciously project psychic energy beyond time and space?

Well your first question you should ask yourself is, where does psychic energy really come from? Scientists will say if such a phenomone is possible, it is the mind. Most occultists will say the soul or even the subconsious(which is kinda linked to the mind). And those who don't believe in the such...well...lets not go there.

If so, could the unstructured, wilful ignorance of post-Enlightened humans (i.e. first-world Westerners) regarding their collective psychic power be a magnet for inquisitive and/or exploitative entities?

First world? Theres still alot of ignorance everywhere. But yes, its a possibilty

If so, could our many, cross-cultural myths of energy-draining supernatural creatures suggest that this interdimensional attraction is long-established?

LONG established, think about how long people have been summoning entitys. Regardless if they're crafted or existed before prior, it doesn't matter. What matters is that these(some of them atleast) entitys have been in contacted for longer than humanity can recall.

If so, could such theoretical entities be concerned at the prospect of a widespread increase in controlled human psychic education?

Depends on the true nature of the entity. Its a yes and no type answer. I'll say no for once with the mindset of "if your some ancient entity, why care for a race of hairless monkeys that do nothing but call to you for petty requests?"

If so, could ghostly phenomenon (apparitions, hauntings, etc.) be attributable to the uptake of human-centric psychic energies, motifs and stories by such entities via some feedback mechanism, whether intended or not?

This goes into theorys of chaos occultism. These entitys are crafted by stories, energys(fear, terror, mental illusion), motifs(I still don't know what that is). I don't think they're ghosts however. I believe a ghost to be the acual psychic energy of the individual at death saying that he or she does not ascend or move on. This goes along with third eye/pineal gland theorys since most ghosts are orbs. I assume the stronger the individual's will, the more of a manifestation will occur(IE: Faces in mirrors/apparitions).
If however I am wrong(which there is always a good chance of) then these orbs/faces are merely psychic byproducts/residue or the former even possibly grafted with memorys from others. The entitys in graveyards and haunted places however could merebly be "psychic trash" if applying this theory. With that said, it would take the investigator to "pull" the said entity.

If so, could the ‘snowballing’ effect of ghost stories increase the energy-investment of interested human parties in those situations, leading to an increase in ghost-related phenomena?

I don't know what "snowballing" is on a paranormal/occult scale

To what degree, then, is the active human ghost investigator the catalyst for recorded phenomena?

Saddly enough I don't know what the word catalyst means.

Further, what is the average psychic capability of the average ghost investigator, and how does that relate to the type and quantity of evidence that they produce?

Depends on how new the ghost investigator is. Did he or she try building psychic energys or work with astral/occult arts? Has he or she had prior paranormal encounters? I'll go with someone thats been doing this for a year or two and hasn't had prior experience perhaps some "feelings" or what not; The capability will be bit higher than other humans because of being around such energys. The results will be grander since the investigator will "Know" at times where to look at that point. The quantity depends on the location and how much activity is in the area. If theres say "1 ghost at location Y" and you produce no results, either A. The ghosts doesn't like you/is at another location/asleep(?) or B. There wasn't a ghost but perhaps something created by stories and feelings(IE: the psychic trash thing).

And what of the group-will experiments used by paranormal investigators to 'produce' results?

I'd say it depends. Depends on whole of the investigator's will/experience, depends on the type of ghost, depends on the area and other factors(magnetic/geo/ect).

Thats my 2 cents.

» login or register to post comments

Interesting...

By Max Szabo on March 1, 2006 - 8:59pm

Thanks very much for your feedback GS. I get the impression you have had experience in some esoteric or occult practices, and are pretty frank about the existence of 'other' worlds.

To clarify; a catalyst is an element that encourages/speeds a reaction. (Heat is often a catalyst for chemical reactions). And by 'snowballing' I mean the growth in the reputation of a haunting, and that it's fame may itself feed the haunting phenomena.

» login or register to post comments

The Shamans Brew March show

By marc_leader on February 28, 2006 - 3:22pm

Hi Max!
I read over your comments and questions and thought that the best way to give you some insight on my views of this topic is to direct you to my new show on WPBN. It should be available in a day or two and is directly related to what your post is about. If you go to this website http://www.tekneek.com/wpbn/html/full_circle.html and find Full Circle March Show you can dowanload it or stream it. Keep in mind that The Shamans Brew is a segment within this radio show, so you will either have to skip ahead or listen to the entire show. I usually come on in the first hour. Hope it answers some questions and I hope too it does not put you to sleep :) Marcus

» login or register to post comments

Note to self: tune in...

By Max Szabo on February 28, 2006 - 4:43pm

Thanks for the link Marcus!

I must start tuning in and see about becoming a distant/ancillary/not-actually-very-useful-but-still-interested bystander re your research group.

Hm.

Does anyone else get a feeling that a new wave of post-Enlightenment, structured inquiry into anomalous phenomena may be the start of a new (and perhaps, simultaneously, also very old) appreciation of our physical and transphysical existence?

The problem, as always, will be one of experimenter-entanglement; the inquiring observer creates, or at the very least alters, the data he or she retrieves. This is accepted within quantum theoretical thinking, but has haunted the scientific mind of the West for a century, or more. Still, given that fact, perhaps the thing is to accept the slippery nature of nature itself, and forget about pinning her down into a full-nelson. Why not dance with her, instead?

» login or register to post comments
  
Ghostly Talk is copyright ©2002-2008, the co-hosts of the audio program Ghostly Talk. All content on the website is copyright © by the submitter of the content. The Ghostly talk audio program is distributed under the Open Content License or the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License (pick your favorite).