![]() |
These are banners of our friends, site members, and affiliates. |
There are currently 0 users and 38 guests online. |
By Poppy at July 15, 2010 - 10:30pm | Cryptozoology I have been interested in Bigfoot since I was a young child. The thought of a bipedal undiscovered ape living in north America is something that I would love to see happen. The debate has been going on for centuries. The native Americans told stories of great creatures living in the woods, and sightings continue through today. It is hard to take serious, because of idiots like those fools in Georgia who played a little joke on the entire world it is impossible to take any reports or evidence as solid. The Patterson film has been examined for 40 years. Some people say there is no way it is a human in a costume. Others say that it is a person in a costume. Not ALL of these people are idiots on either side of the fence. Some are top people in their fields, and really know what they are talking about. This is on BOTH sides of the debate. So who is right? IF these creatures do exist, why is it taking so long to prove or disprove it? With modern tech. being employed, and even though there are still places in the United States were no human being has ever set foot, it seems that it would be only a matter of time before the existence of these creatures is either proven, or dis-proven. I am open to the fact that these creatures might not exist. I am open to the fact that maybe the Patterson film is just a guy in a costume. But in my opinion, it is the real deal. I would like to hear everyone's thoughts on this |
9 weeks 5 days ago
16 weeks 5 days ago
19 weeks 6 days ago
20 weeks 4 days ago
21 weeks 1 hour ago
21 weeks 1 hour ago
23 weeks 16 hours ago
40 weeks 3 days ago
41 weeks 4 days ago
1 year 3 weeks ago