These are banners of our friends, site members, and affiliates.
 Host Bios   On-Demand Show Archives   Forums   Photos   Contact   PR / Affiliates   Appearances   Field Reporters   Downloads  Links 
  
 

Vampire & ghost behaviour deemed scientifically unfeasible...

 
By Max Szabo at November 2, 2006 - 10:02pm | General

Vampire Behavior Not Real, Study Shows
Elisabeth Eaves 10.31.06, 6:00 AM ET

Science hasn’t conclusively ruled out the existence of ghosts and vampires, but two physicists have now proved that certain behavior often attributed to them is impossible.

In their paper “Ghosts, Vampires and Zombies: Cinema Fiction vs. Physics Reality,” University of Central Florida theoretical physics professor Costas Efthimiou and graduate student Sohang Gandhi explore “inconsistencies” in undead conduct “as portrayed in popular films and folklore,” and take issue with movies like Blade, The Sixth Sense and Ghost.

Take Blade. In New Line Cinema’s 1998 vampire flick, the fanged night-dwellers feed on the blood of humans, who, once bitten, turn into vampires themselves. Impossible, says Efthimiou--and he uses a basic math principle, geometric progression, to prove it.

He begins with the assumption that a vampire feeds only once a month. “Certainly a highly conservative assumption,” the paper notes. Every time the vampire feeds, the vampire population increases by one and the human population decreases by one. Efthimiou supposed that the first vampire arrived on Jan. 1, 1600, when the human population was 536,870,911. That means there would have been two vampires and 536,870,910 humans on Feb. 1, four vampires and 536,870,908 humans on March 1, and so forth. With the vampire population increasing geometrically and the human population decreasing geometrically, by the 30th month the human race would have been wiped out.

“In the long run, humans cannot survive under these conditions, even if our population were doubling each month,” Efthimiou says, “and doubling is clearly way beyond the human capacity of reproduction.” Zombies, also thought to turn victims into their own kind, present a similar problem.

Ghosts that can walk through walls, meanwhile, are scientific oxymorons. For ghosts to be able to walk like humans--picture Patrick Swayze’s ethereal presence in Paramount’s Ghost--they would have to put force upon the floor, which in return would exert an equal and opposite force. Walking, in short, depends on Newton’s third law of physics, which states that for each action there is an equal but opposite reaction.

However, ghosts’ uncanny ability to pass through walls and even through living humans demonstrates that they cannot apply any force at all. Put a different way, movies posit that ghosts are both material and material-less. But even if they exhibited “selective material-lessness,” Efthimiou notes, we humans should be able to place stress sensors on the floor to detect the ghost’s presence.

Now if only some scientists would skewer the improbabilities of romantic comedies and action thrillers.

http://www.forbes.com/home/digitalentertainment/2006/10/30/science-ghosts-vampires-tech_media_cx_ee_1031papers.html?partner=poptechstories&boxes=custom

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

OMG, their right! Whatever!

By fratka on November 6, 2006 - 8:18am

Well, that did it for me. I guess my hundreds of hours of recorded video and EVP are all just my imagination. I guess this highly scientific exercise in statistical algebra has rendered our focus of research (of 23 years) pointless and without merit. For those who are thicker than most, that is sarcasm. ;)

Costas Efthimiou and Sohang Gandhi have demonstated nothing more than their ignorance and lack of experience in the very medium they have attempted to discount. They have attempted to discount ghosts (and the other two subjects) through Hollywood movies and folklore. I'm surprised they consider themselves scientists. The mere fact that they try to cite Newtonian physics as a basis or control. Maybe they need to become more aquainted with quantum or stochastic electrodynamics. How about, ever since Einstein presented his paper on relativity and special relativity, classical physics has been degraded to a virtual shell of its former self. Don't get me wrong, on a macroscopic scale newtonian physics still holds pretty strong as long as you are measuring the force of a ball bouncing off a wall. As soon as you start talking about the microscopic or charged particles, newtonian physics falls apart.

Since these physicists think we are all a bunch of morons who follow the whims of Hollywood and the rhetoric of folklore, maybe they would like to present a real study in physics instead of presenting a weekend study on their own false beliefs in what "ghosts" are.... It is apparent through this article that they did absolutely no background research on the entity itself before opening their big mouths.

Discounting an anomaly that has been reported before recorded history by citing Hollywood!? What a joke?

» login or register to post comments

This whole paper assumes

By BobbyT on November 3, 2006 - 9:21pm

This whole paper assumes that any or all paranormal entities are bound by the same physics we are. Or that we even fully understand the universe and the physics that govern it. Serious paranormal researchers are just trying to prove the existence of anomalies. Yet these scientists who would normally snub their noses at paranormal research, now know more about anomalies than the people who do the research.

One more thing occurred to me. In vampire lore, the vampires choose who will be turned and who is just food. Some people get drained dry and some get turned into vampires.

» login or register to post comments
  
Ghostly Talk is copyright ©2002-2008, the co-hosts of the audio program Ghostly Talk. All content on the website is copyright © by the submitter of the content. The Ghostly talk audio program is distributed under the Open Content License or the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License (pick your favorite).